Friday, June 15, 2007

African Slaves and Noble Savages

From the lectures in class we learned about the origins of slavery. We also learned Africans were subjected to slavery in their own countries. Even though there was slavery going on in Africa, it differed greatly from they type of slavery happening in the Americas. We learned that slaves in Africa had more independence than slaves in America and that they only worked to pay off debt or because they were taken captives from other tribes during battle. With this in mind, I believe that Hugh Jones’, author of “They That Are Born There Talk Good English,” was wrong in saying that African slaves had it much easier in America than in Africa.

We also learned from the lectures that the natives were viewed in two different ways. They were either seen as noble savages or ignoble savages. The noble savage was seen as uncorrupted by the influences of civilization. I thought it was interesting that noble savages were favored among the colonists because according to them the ignoble savages were violent killers. The colonists liked the fact that some of the natives were not corrupt; however, the colonists forced their laws and ways of life onto the natives, and as a result of this, made them become corrupt by civilization.

3 comments:

Carlos said...

I'm going to go ahead and agree that Hugh Jone's was somehow misinformed as to the treatment of slaves in America. From pretty much everything I have ever come across in my academic life concerning slavery, I've always been under the impression there was nothing good about it.
Being imprisoned and forced into working in sometimes deadly conditions, punished mentally and physically on the daily,having to constantly be fearful of death, being raped, killed, sold again... Jone's striking memoir of slave society in America baffled me, and I'm sure there were situations where slaves were treated well and fed regularly, but c'mon. Slavery was brutal and I don't see how many could argue against that. Where was this town where slaves' "owner's interest and purse are deeply engaged" in providing a good quality of life for them.

Jessica said...

I also found it interesting that the Native peoples were viewed as "noble" or "innoble" savages either way they were still referred to as savages.

Tai Edwards said...

Good point about Hugh Jones' primary source. And also a though provoking comment about corrupting "noble savages."